Between Bahrain and the Kingdom of the constitutional reform and revolution on the Alnza
According to Alalam.ir Website : What a difference between the Kingdom of Bahrain and its system of tribal totalitarian Britain or Sweden Bmmketehma Aldstureten democracies and Aeriktin AlhaddattinYes, since the beginning, the evidence suggests that the reform project Astelt his soul, and was stillborn, leaving nothing but the name, although Ahtfaat and celebrations by the systemAnd that the Constitution is not only a detailed document on the size of government, not on what people wantAfter ten years, and reached all the opposition parties, which participated in the parliament, lame, and that did not participate - where felt ineffective from the outset under the Constitution is not compatible it - and got all convinced that the reform of the case is impossible, and that reform is possible, according to available means, with the strong conviction of the importance of reform in the system, not change, that the best way to BahrainBut by the facts that the system seems unable to repair the deep and serious sense for reasons of its history and politics, and his manner of the country, and slim build tribal refuse to reformSo that the demands of reform brought by the Bahraini people by ninety years are the same as demanded by the people in the revolution recently, however, the system could not over a century to do what is required of him to build a modern state and regulate the relationship between him and the people in the form of constitutional agreed, when permission responding?This is the fundamental question posed by the opposition of all models, and in the forefront of the movement of February 14I was surprised the size of the movement and momentum and the comprehensiveness and quality and high demands, so put the principle of dialogue, a principle that was rejected by the length of the line, while the opposition was calling for the system over the ten years the dialogue out of the country and the people from the predicament of the tribal system, but no one responded with met with opposition calls for dialogue and the absolute rejection is justified by the refereeBut what is only a few days on the morning of 03.16.2011 and if the system appears on the reality and the process of 'cleansing' Square Circle Pearl peaceful protesters, and who are supposed to debate with themYes, right here, one has to wonder what this kind of dialogue that beg with fire and gunpowder? , To reach an answer / conviction: that the system was not in the process of poplar, and does not want dialogue, but intend to order its affairs from the most to undermine the popular movement in the rotor, thinking that repression and security grip end the movement, as if nothing had happened, and with the support of regional allies and international and enough fighting the evil of God's faithfulI think that if there is dialogue that is on his own terms is, in his own way is, to be is out of the game, so he held the so-called conference of national consensus throughout the month of July, this conference could not won a solution to the crisis of Bahrain, but just make matters worse and nationalization, crisisBecause it missed the real political demands of the Bahraini people and the forces active in the maze is not futileUnder these slogans and popular demands of government in Bahrain has become the sword from the left with the demands for the systemPopular demands at minimum a radical reform on the basis of a constitutional monarchy, the full meaning of the political concept of constitutional monarchy in the sense that King has not ruled as it is known in constitutional monarchies into its retaining position symbolic of the state and according to the National Action Charter and rallied by the refereeOr popular demands in the maximum: the toppling of the regime and the consequent findings, which were made by some opposition parties to establish the republican systemThe system has lost himself many opportunities where he could only reform itself in agreement with the opposition for more than ten years, during and accept the opposition to these reforms, but he did not and simply rejected the maneuver and gain the loyalty and the splitting of society into boredom and the bees, and only the reforms of form without the coreNow that things have come to what the status of the victims and the blood Msvukh appears to decline by the opposition, led by the movement of 14 February, it became impossible things, and on the system but be aware of thisHe said Bahrain before 14 February is an other after 14 February, recognized this at the same time the Crown Prince of Bahrain at the beginning of his call for dialogueIn view of the facts on the ground and the continuation of the popular political movement does not remain only two choices in front of the only two constitutional monarchy as a minimum, maximum or fall sooner or laterThat the internal situation and the regional and even international is not in favor of the regime in BahrainTherefore, the solution to the impasse in Bahrain lies in changing the system itself in line with the legitimate demands and fair to the people of Bahrain ...
Original Text At Alalam.ir
